"The Apologists’ Evening Prayer" by C.S. Lewis
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
I am personally not a huge “drop everything” fan of C.S. Lewis, but I do appreciate many of his contributions. This sonnet goes nearly unnoticed and unmentioned of his writings:
From all my lame defeats and oh! much more
From all the victories that I seemed to score;
From cleverness shot forth on Thy behalf
at which, while angels weep, the audience laugh;
From all my proofs of Thy divinity,
Thou, who wouldst give no sign, deliver me.
Thoughts are but coins. Let me not trust, instead
of Thee, their thin-worn image of Thy head.
From all my thoughts, even from my thoughts of Thee,
O thou fair Silence, fall, and set me free.
Lord of the narrow gate and the needle's eye,
Take from me all my trumpery lest I die.
Lewis’ transparency is staggering, for here he presents to the world the weakness of his argument: himself. Recall that apologetics is defending the faith, and here C.S. Lewis confesses that every flaw in speaking on behalf of The Almighty lies with himself. Winning an argument for the sake of proving a point is not the purpose of apologetics. Winning is lame, victory is a mere mark on the scorecard and the all witty cleverness that brought the house down makes angels weep.
Our actions speak louder than our words, so having the best intellectual argument means nothing when our lives do not follow suit. What Lewis is asking is for deliverance from himself, for sin clouds the clarity of God’s purity.
Lewis says “thoughts are but coins.” A thought is a self-contained mental form. I believe Lewis has in mind the minting process by which a coin is made, where an image is stamped on a lifeless thing. He asks for God to let him trust in the very person of He Who Is True and Living instead of an idea that easily becomes thin and worn.
A thought, like a coin, can be a throw away thing that covers well-bottoms.
A thought, like a coin, secures the purchase of an item meets our needs/wants at our command.
We do not put our faith in a representation—this is idolatry--and a god kept in a comfortable image is mockery. Lewis asks to be freed from his thoughts, which become improper when the thought itself is substituted for The Person.
The Apologist needs no other argument, no other plea. He needs The One who is Enough, “and that He died for me.”
From all my lame defeats and oh! much more
From all the victories that I seemed to score;
From cleverness shot forth on Thy behalf
at which, while angels weep, the audience laugh;
From all my proofs of Thy divinity,
Thou, who wouldst give no sign, deliver me.
Thoughts are but coins. Let me not trust, instead
of Thee, their thin-worn image of Thy head.
From all my thoughts, even from my thoughts of Thee,
O thou fair Silence, fall, and set me free.
Lord of the narrow gate and the needle's eye,
Take from me all my trumpery lest I die.
Lewis’ transparency is staggering, for here he presents to the world the weakness of his argument: himself. Recall that apologetics is defending the faith, and here C.S. Lewis confesses that every flaw in speaking on behalf of The Almighty lies with himself. Winning an argument for the sake of proving a point is not the purpose of apologetics. Winning is lame, victory is a mere mark on the scorecard and the all witty cleverness that brought the house down makes angels weep.
Our actions speak louder than our words, so having the best intellectual argument means nothing when our lives do not follow suit. What Lewis is asking is for deliverance from himself, for sin clouds the clarity of God’s purity.
Lewis says “thoughts are but coins.” A thought is a self-contained mental form. I believe Lewis has in mind the minting process by which a coin is made, where an image is stamped on a lifeless thing. He asks for God to let him trust in the very person of He Who Is True and Living instead of an idea that easily becomes thin and worn.
A thought, like a coin, can be a throw away thing that covers well-bottoms.
A thought, like a coin, secures the purchase of an item meets our needs/wants at our command.
We do not put our faith in a representation—this is idolatry--and a god kept in a comfortable image is mockery. Lewis asks to be freed from his thoughts, which become improper when the thought itself is substituted for The Person.
The Apologist needs no other argument, no other plea. He needs The One who is Enough, “and that He died for me.”
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Popular posts from this blog
The Smooth-flowing Life
Legend has it that the astronomer Ptolemy (1st century A.D.) suggested that falling stars were caused by the gods moving in the heavens, thus knocking stars out of their places. Somehow people reasoned that that if the gods were moving, they must be getting close to earth so they would lift their "prayers" or "wishes" (literally, "desires") whenever they saw the stars falling in hopes the gods would notice and grant a favorable answer. But how does one wish on falling star? Once you see it, it's gone before the wish or prayer can be made! The answer is simple: meteor shower. That's how to get your wish. Mrs. Ann Hodges had a wish fall right into her lap. Sort of. In 1954 Mrs. Hodges was sleeping on the couch when a 8 1/2 pound meteorite fell through her house and into her living room where it bounced off the radio and struck her left hip leaving her with a bruise. Not sure what she was wishing, but that's not how to do it. Epictetus hel
A Reflection in Plato’s “Republic” Book 2
Early in Book 2 of Plato’s “Republic,” the discussion turns into the story of a man named Gyges who finds a ring that makes him invisible. Using the powers of the ring, he reports to the court of his king, seduces the queen “and with her help conspired against the king and slew him, and took the kingdom.” What would happen if there were two rings, one worn by an unjust man and the other by a just man? The story attempts to make the case that a just man will act unjustly if given the opportunity to think he is doing right, if only by himself. But what if he doesn’t? What if there was no ring, and what if there was a perfectly unjust man and a perfectly just man and both had everything they needed in life? The unjust man must cover his steps in order to be distinguished and succeed. In the eyes of others, he appears to be just. But what about the just man, who appears to be unjust? “They will tell you that the just man who is thought unjust will be scourged, racked, bound-will have hi