Three New Additions To My Desk
Actually, it’s an ad-duck-tion. I missed the perfect opportunity to say, “and they’re in a row, too!” Silly goose.
socrates meets frigidaire
Galatians 6:1-5
What kind of person does it take to bear burdens?
That depends on the size and/or kind of burden.
Well then, what would it take for a large burden? Describe the person who could move, say, a refrigerator/freezer by himself.
Well, he could take a dolly or hand truck and . . .
By himself, I mean. With no tools. What kind of person could lift that burden?
A rather large person, I would think. With broad shoulders, hands like bricks, arms like tree trunks, I suppose. He must have a broad chest and thick legs. His arms must be able to wrap around the burden, or at least his hands must get a good grip on it.
What about a little girl? Could she bear the burden?
Of course not! She is too small, too frail! A little girl is too delicate and could be injured!
Consider this: what if the refrigerator was full? What would the burly man have to do to move his burden so as not to damage the contents?
Lift carefully and slowly, I imagine. He would need to squat down, grasp tightly, lift carefully, move slowly, replace gently.
Could the little girl move a full refrigerator? Could a little girl handle the burden?
Well, putting it that way, there may perhaps be a way.
How could she bear the burden?
The little girl could move some of the burden, but not all.
How do you imagine that?
She could move the contents of the refrigerator a bit at a time, but not the entire unit at once by itself.
Does the little girl, then, bear the burden?
Certainly, but not all of it.
But she does bear a significant part of it, though it be pieces at a time?
Without doubt.
What ways could the man move the contents and the unit?
He can lift the lift the unit but the contents may not remain intact; or he could unload the unit then move it.
If the two were teamed, would it be beneficial for the man to do all the work for the little girl?
Not if they were expected to work together, no.
Does bearing one another’s burdens mean we must take the full weight of what others bear on ourselves?
If would be nice if one could do that for me . . .
But what of his own burdens?
I am not sure I follow.
If one, who bears his own burdens, takes the entire burden of another on himself, who then bears also the responsibility for the additional burden?
Responsibility belongs to the one to whom the burden belongs.
Is it reasonable for the burden bearer to assume responsibility for the additional burden? If the burden contains consequences, should he be the one to bear the consequences of the additional burden also?
Of course not.
Then what is the ministry of bearing one another’s burdens?
Taking a part of the load, not all of it.
It is expected that one be burden-free before one helps another?
That would be expected, but impossible.
Why?
Because each has his own burden to bear.
And . . .?
If you took all my burden plus your own, you would take twice the load
Like a man lifting a full refrigerator?
Yes--and what damage could occur to the delicacies!
Then what kind of ministry would that be?
An incredible ministry!
Matthew 11:28-30.
What kind of person does it take to bear burdens?
That depends on the size and/or kind of burden.
Well then, what would it take for a large burden? Describe the person who could move, say, a refrigerator/freezer by himself.
Well, he could take a dolly or hand truck and . . .
By himself, I mean. With no tools. What kind of person could lift that burden?
A rather large person, I would think. With broad shoulders, hands like bricks, arms like tree trunks, I suppose. He must have a broad chest and thick legs. His arms must be able to wrap around the burden, or at least his hands must get a good grip on it.
What about a little girl? Could she bear the burden?
Of course not! She is too small, too frail! A little girl is too delicate and could be injured!
Consider this: what if the refrigerator was full? What would the burly man have to do to move his burden so as not to damage the contents?
Lift carefully and slowly, I imagine. He would need to squat down, grasp tightly, lift carefully, move slowly, replace gently.
Could the little girl move a full refrigerator? Could a little girl handle the burden?
Well, putting it that way, there may perhaps be a way.
How could she bear the burden?
The little girl could move some of the burden, but not all.
How do you imagine that?
She could move the contents of the refrigerator a bit at a time, but not the entire unit at once by itself.
Does the little girl, then, bear the burden?
Certainly, but not all of it.
But she does bear a significant part of it, though it be pieces at a time?
Without doubt.
What ways could the man move the contents and the unit?
He can lift the lift the unit but the contents may not remain intact; or he could unload the unit then move it.
If the two were teamed, would it be beneficial for the man to do all the work for the little girl?
Not if they were expected to work together, no.
Does bearing one another’s burdens mean we must take the full weight of what others bear on ourselves?
If would be nice if one could do that for me . . .
But what of his own burdens?
I am not sure I follow.
If one, who bears his own burdens, takes the entire burden of another on himself, who then bears also the responsibility for the additional burden?
Responsibility belongs to the one to whom the burden belongs.
Is it reasonable for the burden bearer to assume responsibility for the additional burden? If the burden contains consequences, should he be the one to bear the consequences of the additional burden also?
Of course not.
Then what is the ministry of bearing one another’s burdens?
Taking a part of the load, not all of it.
It is expected that one be burden-free before one helps another?
That would be expected, but impossible.
Why?
Because each has his own burden to bear.
And . . .?
If you took all my burden plus your own, you would take twice the load
Like a man lifting a full refrigerator?
Yes--and what damage could occur to the delicacies!
Then what kind of ministry would that be?
An incredible ministry!
Matthew 11:28-30.
Popular posts from this blog
“Men and women who saw God in the Bible: Why did they not all die?”
July 2004 I went to Kenya, Africa to speak in two Pastor’s Conferences on the subject of Man, Sin and Salvation. At the end of each day I left just over an hour for questions (half the time were questions touching the subject of my lectures, and the other half for “open questions”; that is, people could ask anything). For the next few weeks, I will be sharing the questions that were asked of me, and my answers—and believe me when I say these people really know how to think! Question from Kenya #1: “Men and women who saw God in the Bible: Why did they not all die?” [“ But He said, ‘You cannot see My face, for no man can see Me and live! ’” (Exodus 33:20) was the basis of the student’s question]. Answer: First, consider those who did see God—how did they respond when they saw Him? They were instantly aware of their sinfulness, and God’s holiness and righteousness (to name a few. And notice also that each responded in an attitude of worship, bowing down): Abraham built altars, wors
A Sonnet
“My God, where is that ancient heat towards thee, Wherewith whole shoals of martyrs once did burn, Besides their other flames? Doth poetry Wear Venus' livery? only serve her turn? Why are not sonnets made of thee? and lays Upon thine altar burnt? Cannot thy love Heighten a spirit to sound out thy praise As well as any she? Cannot thy Dove Outstrip their Cupid easily in flight? Or, since thy ways are deep, and still the fame, Will not a verse run smooth that bears thy name! Why doth that fire, which by thy power and might Each breast does feel, no braver fuel choose Than that, which one day, worms may chance refuse. Sure Lord, there is enough in thee to dry Oceans of ink; for, as the Deluge did Cover the earth, so doth thy Majesty: Each cloud distills thy praise, and doth forbid Poets to turn it to another use. Roses and lilies speak thee; and to make A pair of cheeks of them, is thy abuse Why should I women's eyes for crystal take? Such poor invention burns in their low mind Wh
A Fresh Perception
“In primitive times, when man awakes in a world that is newly created, poetry awakes with him. In the face of the marvellous things that dazzle and intoxicate him, his first speech is a hymn simply. He is still so close to God that all his meditations are ecstatic, all his dreams are visions. His bosom swells, he sings as he breathes. His lyre has but three strings—God, the soul, creation; but this threefold mystery envelopes everything, this threefold idea embraces everything. The earth is still almost deserted. . . . He leads that nomadic pastoral life with which all civilizations begin, and which is so well adapted to solitary contemplation, to fanciful reverie. He follows every suggestion, he goes hither and thither, at random. His thought, like his life, resembles a cloud that changes its shape and its direction according to the wind that drives it. Such is the first man, such is the first poet. He is young, he is cynical. Prayer is his sole religion, the ode is his only form of