Remember The Lost
socrates meets frigidaire
Galatians 6:1-5
What kind of person does it take to bear burdens?
That depends on the size and/or kind of burden.
Well then, what would it take for a large burden? Describe the person who could move, say, a refrigerator/freezer by himself.
Well, he could take a dolly or hand truck and . . .
By himself, I mean. With no tools. What kind of person could lift that burden?
A rather large person, I would think. With broad shoulders, hands like bricks, arms like tree trunks, I suppose. He must have a broad chest and thick legs. His arms must be able to wrap around the burden, or at least his hands must get a good grip on it.
What about a little girl? Could she bear the burden?
Of course not! She is too small, too frail! A little girl is too delicate and could be injured!
Consider this: what if the refrigerator was full? What would the burly man have to do to move his burden so as not to damage the contents?
Lift carefully and slowly, I imagine. He would need to squat down, grasp tightly, lift carefully, move slowly, replace gently.
Could the little girl move a full refrigerator? Could a little girl handle the burden?
Well, putting it that way, there may perhaps be a way.
How could she bear the burden?
The little girl could move some of the burden, but not all.
How do you imagine that?
She could move the contents of the refrigerator a bit at a time, but not the entire unit at once by itself.
Does the little girl, then, bear the burden?
Certainly, but not all of it.
But she does bear a significant part of it, though it be pieces at a time?
Without doubt.
What ways could the man move the contents and the unit?
He can lift the lift the unit but the contents may not remain intact; or he could unload the unit then move it.
If the two were teamed, would it be beneficial for the man to do all the work for the little girl?
Not if they were expected to work together, no.
Does bearing one another’s burdens mean we must take the full weight of what others bear on ourselves?
If would be nice if one could do that for me . . .
But what of his own burdens?
I am not sure I follow.
If one, who bears his own burdens, takes the entire burden of another on himself, who then bears also the responsibility for the additional burden?
Responsibility belongs to the one to whom the burden belongs.
Is it reasonable for the burden bearer to assume responsibility for the additional burden? If the burden contains consequences, should he be the one to bear the consequences of the additional burden also?
Of course not.
Then what is the ministry of bearing one another’s burdens?
Taking a part of the load, not all of it.
It is expected that one be burden-free before one helps another?
That would be expected, but impossible.
Why?
Because each has his own burden to bear.
And . . .?
If you took all my burden plus your own, you would take twice the load
Like a man lifting a full refrigerator?
Yes--and what damage could occur to the delicacies!
Then what kind of ministry would that be?
An incredible ministry!
Matthew 11:28-30.
What kind of person does it take to bear burdens?
That depends on the size and/or kind of burden.
Well then, what would it take for a large burden? Describe the person who could move, say, a refrigerator/freezer by himself.
Well, he could take a dolly or hand truck and . . .
By himself, I mean. With no tools. What kind of person could lift that burden?
A rather large person, I would think. With broad shoulders, hands like bricks, arms like tree trunks, I suppose. He must have a broad chest and thick legs. His arms must be able to wrap around the burden, or at least his hands must get a good grip on it.
What about a little girl? Could she bear the burden?
Of course not! She is too small, too frail! A little girl is too delicate and could be injured!
Consider this: what if the refrigerator was full? What would the burly man have to do to move his burden so as not to damage the contents?
Lift carefully and slowly, I imagine. He would need to squat down, grasp tightly, lift carefully, move slowly, replace gently.
Could the little girl move a full refrigerator? Could a little girl handle the burden?
Well, putting it that way, there may perhaps be a way.
How could she bear the burden?
The little girl could move some of the burden, but not all.
How do you imagine that?
She could move the contents of the refrigerator a bit at a time, but not the entire unit at once by itself.
Does the little girl, then, bear the burden?
Certainly, but not all of it.
But she does bear a significant part of it, though it be pieces at a time?
Without doubt.
What ways could the man move the contents and the unit?
He can lift the lift the unit but the contents may not remain intact; or he could unload the unit then move it.
If the two were teamed, would it be beneficial for the man to do all the work for the little girl?
Not if they were expected to work together, no.
Does bearing one another’s burdens mean we must take the full weight of what others bear on ourselves?
If would be nice if one could do that for me . . .
But what of his own burdens?
I am not sure I follow.
If one, who bears his own burdens, takes the entire burden of another on himself, who then bears also the responsibility for the additional burden?
Responsibility belongs to the one to whom the burden belongs.
Is it reasonable for the burden bearer to assume responsibility for the additional burden? If the burden contains consequences, should he be the one to bear the consequences of the additional burden also?
Of course not.
Then what is the ministry of bearing one another’s burdens?
Taking a part of the load, not all of it.
It is expected that one be burden-free before one helps another?
That would be expected, but impossible.
Why?
Because each has his own burden to bear.
And . . .?
If you took all my burden plus your own, you would take twice the load
Like a man lifting a full refrigerator?
Yes--and what damage could occur to the delicacies!
Then what kind of ministry would that be?
An incredible ministry!
Matthew 11:28-30.
Popular posts from this blog
The Smooth-flowing Life
Legend has it that the astronomer Ptolemy (1st century A.D.) suggested that falling stars were caused by the gods moving in the heavens, thus knocking stars out of their places. Somehow people reasoned that that if the gods were moving, they must be getting close to earth so they would lift their "prayers" or "wishes" (literally, "desires") whenever they saw the stars falling in hopes the gods would notice and grant a favorable answer. But how does one wish on falling star? Once you see it, it's gone before the wish or prayer can be made! The answer is simple: meteor shower. That's how to get your wish. Mrs. Ann Hodges had a wish fall right into her lap. Sort of. In 1954 Mrs. Hodges was sleeping on the couch when a 8 1/2 pound meteorite fell through her house and into her living room where it bounced off the radio and struck her left hip leaving her with a bruise. Not sure what she was wishing, but that's not how to do it. Epictetus hel
A Reflection in Plato’s “Republic” Book 2
Early in Book 2 of Plato’s “Republic,” the discussion turns into the story of a man named Gyges who finds a ring that makes him invisible. Using the powers of the ring, he reports to the court of his king, seduces the queen “and with her help conspired against the king and slew him, and took the kingdom.” What would happen if there were two rings, one worn by an unjust man and the other by a just man? The story attempts to make the case that a just man will act unjustly if given the opportunity to think he is doing right, if only by himself. But what if he doesn’t? What if there was no ring, and what if there was a perfectly unjust man and a perfectly just man and both had everything they needed in life? The unjust man must cover his steps in order to be distinguished and succeed. In the eyes of others, he appears to be just. But what about the just man, who appears to be unjust? “They will tell you that the just man who is thought unjust will be scourged, racked, bound-will have hi
Three New Additions To My Desk
Actually, it’s an ad-duck-tion. I missed the perfect opportunity to say, “and they’re in a row, too!” Silly goose.