What are you looking for?
- Get link
- Other Apps
Lately I've been spending more time surfing websites representative of various world views. One cannot help but notice how so many are thriving on enmity against others while simultaneously striving for unity amongst the like-minded. Each group at bottom presents in various ways one common desire: unity. As to what that unity is, who it includes, how it is achieved, why it is necessary, etc. is of widespread opinion; however, a closer look at each cause reveals that unity is not really the goal, but reconciliation.
Mankind is ultimately hard at work in the context of discord, stress, anxiety. Relationships are strained inidividually, ethnically, nationally, politically, religiously; yet, people are invariably desiring to reach a resolution, bridge a gap, inaugurate change, repair the breach, compose harmony. But what is the adversary? Man and (blank) are at odds.
What is the (blank)?
The Epicureans (in their various forms today) teach that which brings the most pleasure is that which is good. Hedonism is an end in itself. The individual is free to do as he or she pleases, as long as nobody else gets hurt. There is nothing to fear, and subsequently, nothing to hope for. Whatever happens happens by chance, luck.
Stoics, on the other hand, hold to the idea that nature is directed by an impersonal force. All is god (pantheism). One must simply accept circumstances as they are. We are at the mercy of blind chance.
Briefly put, there seems to be only two options for mankind:
1) The Universe is fluke, nobody loves you, have a nice life;
2) Impersonal forces at work, accept your fate. It is your destiny, young Skywalker.
Truth be told, both systems have not explained why they seek deliverance from pain, from the futility of life. Why else would one seek to work on his karma? Why else would one hope that he did enough right to be reincarnated on a higher plane?
One might conclude that reconciliation must occur on another level--man must be reconciled to life itself. As one lives he spends his time and energy making adjustments to find peace. Do men really desire to be at peace with cold, stress-filled, brief, hard, disaster-ridden life? If this were the case, then what was done against "life" that men should seek peace with it?
Perhaps one might conclude that reconciliation must occur with things, The Universe (all things seen and unseen, known and unknown in contrast against "the universe" which is all we currently know). To master The Universe, one must gain control over sources. One must harness and direct and to do this requires absolute knowledge. Has science ever triumphed over nature? Only if we have finished playing the "oh, THAT's how it works," game. If man is to be reconciled to the Universe, what was done against the Universe that man should seek peace with it?
How can one bridge a gap with the intangible? Is life tangible?
How can one repair what is broken between an individual and the Universe?
Reconciliation is more than repairing what is broken. Reconciliation requires something that never ends--a relationship, for better or worse. Impersonal relationships have never begun, so there is nothing that needs be reconciled; however, reconciliation leads to true life and it is there one finds all creation groaning, waiting for man's redemption to be complete through repentance and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.
God and man are at enmity because of sin. The moral law-giver has been offended by individual lack of love for Him, by individual reshaping of who He is into one's own image, by misrepresentation of His name, by failure to worship, by disregarding instruction, by hatred which amounts to murder, by lust, by theft and mismanagment of all we do not own, by mishandling truth, by downright selfishness. Man is separated from God, the Creator, by sin. God has repaired the breach, if only one will admit how God sees his or her heart. If His work in Christ Jesus is rejected, then God must let justice take its course and one is left with eternal punishment.
Mankind is ultimately hard at work in the context of discord, stress, anxiety. Relationships are strained inidividually, ethnically, nationally, politically, religiously; yet, people are invariably desiring to reach a resolution, bridge a gap, inaugurate change, repair the breach, compose harmony. But what is the adversary? Man and (blank) are at odds.
What is the (blank)?
The Epicureans (in their various forms today) teach that which brings the most pleasure is that which is good. Hedonism is an end in itself. The individual is free to do as he or she pleases, as long as nobody else gets hurt. There is nothing to fear, and subsequently, nothing to hope for. Whatever happens happens by chance, luck.
Stoics, on the other hand, hold to the idea that nature is directed by an impersonal force. All is god (pantheism). One must simply accept circumstances as they are. We are at the mercy of blind chance.
Briefly put, there seems to be only two options for mankind:
1) The Universe is fluke, nobody loves you, have a nice life;
2) Impersonal forces at work, accept your fate. It is your destiny, young Skywalker.
Truth be told, both systems have not explained why they seek deliverance from pain, from the futility of life. Why else would one seek to work on his karma? Why else would one hope that he did enough right to be reincarnated on a higher plane?
One might conclude that reconciliation must occur on another level--man must be reconciled to life itself. As one lives he spends his time and energy making adjustments to find peace. Do men really desire to be at peace with cold, stress-filled, brief, hard, disaster-ridden life? If this were the case, then what was done against "life" that men should seek peace with it?
Perhaps one might conclude that reconciliation must occur with things, The Universe (all things seen and unseen, known and unknown in contrast against "the universe" which is all we currently know). To master The Universe, one must gain control over sources. One must harness and direct and to do this requires absolute knowledge. Has science ever triumphed over nature? Only if we have finished playing the "oh, THAT's how it works," game. If man is to be reconciled to the Universe, what was done against the Universe that man should seek peace with it?
How can one bridge a gap with the intangible? Is life tangible?
How can one repair what is broken between an individual and the Universe?
Reconciliation is more than repairing what is broken. Reconciliation requires something that never ends--a relationship, for better or worse. Impersonal relationships have never begun, so there is nothing that needs be reconciled; however, reconciliation leads to true life and it is there one finds all creation groaning, waiting for man's redemption to be complete through repentance and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.
God and man are at enmity because of sin. The moral law-giver has been offended by individual lack of love for Him, by individual reshaping of who He is into one's own image, by misrepresentation of His name, by failure to worship, by disregarding instruction, by hatred which amounts to murder, by lust, by theft and mismanagment of all we do not own, by mishandling truth, by downright selfishness. Man is separated from God, the Creator, by sin. God has repaired the breach, if only one will admit how God sees his or her heart. If His work in Christ Jesus is rejected, then God must let justice take its course and one is left with eternal punishment.
- Get link
- Other Apps
Popular posts from this blog
“Men and women who saw God in the Bible: Why did they not all die?”
July 2004 I went to Kenya, Africa to speak in two Pastor’s Conferences on the subject of Man, Sin and Salvation. At the end of each day I left just over an hour for questions (half the time were questions touching the subject of my lectures, and the other half for “open questions”; that is, people could ask anything). For the next few weeks, I will be sharing the questions that were asked of me, and my answers—and believe me when I say these people really know how to think! Question from Kenya #1: “Men and women who saw God in the Bible: Why did they not all die?” [“ But He said, ‘You cannot see My face, for no man can see Me and live! ’” (Exodus 33:20) was the basis of the student’s question]. Answer: First, consider those who did see God—how did they respond when they saw Him? They were instantly aware of their sinfulness, and God’s holiness and righteousness (to name a few. And notice also that each responded in an attitude of worship, bowing down): Abraham built altars, wors
A Sonnet
“My God, where is that ancient heat towards thee, Wherewith whole shoals of martyrs once did burn, Besides their other flames? Doth poetry Wear Venus' livery? only serve her turn? Why are not sonnets made of thee? and lays Upon thine altar burnt? Cannot thy love Heighten a spirit to sound out thy praise As well as any she? Cannot thy Dove Outstrip their Cupid easily in flight? Or, since thy ways are deep, and still the fame, Will not a verse run smooth that bears thy name! Why doth that fire, which by thy power and might Each breast does feel, no braver fuel choose Than that, which one day, worms may chance refuse. Sure Lord, there is enough in thee to dry Oceans of ink; for, as the Deluge did Cover the earth, so doth thy Majesty: Each cloud distills thy praise, and doth forbid Poets to turn it to another use. Roses and lilies speak thee; and to make A pair of cheeks of them, is thy abuse Why should I women's eyes for crystal take? Such poor invention burns in their low mind Wh
Welcome, May!
The past few weeks have been stressful. Training new employees, dealing with difficult customers, not sleeping well, not exercising (I’ve gained 20 pounds in the last two years), getting through family drama (two life-threatening events in the same day, 2000 miles apart: my dad’s heart attack in NM and a 9 year grandchild starting the rest of his life with Type 1 Diabetes) . . . My CrossFit lifestyle withered into oblivion when I lost my job at the University in 2020, as Covid got going. Deep depression brought me to a standstill as I took a few months to try to reset. Since then, my physical status has been on steady decline. Now my daily schedule looks something like this: Work 3-11 pm (on a good day), Go to bed at 4 am, get up between 10:30 am and noon, get booted up and go back to work. If I get one day off a week I’m fortunate. At least I don’t have to work all night for now. That was the worst. So I haven’t had time or energy to do much, even read, much less write. And since my