Who did the women see at the tomb: a seated angel, a young man sitting, two men standing or two angels sitting?
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
This question reminds me of those lateral thinking problems: “A man and his son are in a car crash. The father is killed and the child is taken to hospital gravely injured. When he gets there, the surgeon says, 'I can't operate on this boy - for he is my son!!!' How can this possibly be?”
Some evidence has been withheld behind the question, so the problem appears to be more difficult than it really is; for example: Matthew 28:2-5 describes at least one angel who seemed to be the one responsible for rolling the stone, as witnessed by the guards, not the women. “And behold, a severe earthquake had occurred, for an angel of the Lord descended from heaven and came and rolled away the stone and sat upon it. And his appearance was like lightning and his clothing as white as snow. The guards shook for fear of him and became like dead men.”
When the women arrive, there is no mention that they see the one who sat on the stone. We do know they see at least one sitting inside the tomb (Luke 24:1-4, Mark 16:5) sitting opposite another angel (John 20:12). When the women enter, at least one of the angels speaks. “The angel said to the women, ‘Do not be afraid; for I know that you are looking for Jesus who has been crucified’” (Matthew 28:5).
Are they angels or are they men? Clearly the two men were angels and if there were two in the sepulcher, then there was at least one. The angel who rolled the stone still could have been sitting on the stone, which would bring the grand total to three angels (though the gospel writers make no mention of him remaining there). The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
The most important and most glaring fact remains undisputed:
Some evidence has been withheld behind the question, so the problem appears to be more difficult than it really is; for example: Matthew 28:2-5 describes at least one angel who seemed to be the one responsible for rolling the stone, as witnessed by the guards, not the women. “And behold, a severe earthquake had occurred, for an angel of the Lord descended from heaven and came and rolled away the stone and sat upon it. And his appearance was like lightning and his clothing as white as snow. The guards shook for fear of him and became like dead men.”
When the women arrive, there is no mention that they see the one who sat on the stone. We do know they see at least one sitting inside the tomb (Luke 24:1-4, Mark 16:5) sitting opposite another angel (John 20:12). When the women enter, at least one of the angels speaks. “The angel said to the women, ‘Do not be afraid; for I know that you are looking for Jesus who has been crucified’” (Matthew 28:5).
Are they angels or are they men? Clearly the two men were angels and if there were two in the sepulcher, then there was at least one. The angel who rolled the stone still could have been sitting on the stone, which would bring the grand total to three angels (though the gospel writers make no mention of him remaining there). The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
The most important and most glaring fact remains undisputed:
- “He is not here, for He has risen, just as He said. Come; see the place where He was lying.” (Matthew 28:6)
- “Do not be amazed; you are looking for Jesus the Nazarene, who has been crucified. He has risen; He is not here; behold, here is the place where they laid Him.” (Mark 16:5)
- “Why do you seek the living One among the dead? He is not here, but He has risen.” (Luke 24:5-6)
- Cheer up, weepy! Here I am! (John 20)
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Popular posts from this blog
I’ll Be Gnome For Christmas
The Island-Fish
“O ye passengers, whom may God preserve! come up quickly in to the ship, hasten to embark, and leave your merchandise, and flee with your lives, and save yourselves from destruction; for this apparent island, upon which ye are, is not really an island, but it is a great fish that hath become stationary in the midst of the sea, and the sand hath accumulated upon it, so that it hath become like an island, and trees have grown upon it since times of old; and when ye lighted the fire upon it, the fish felt the heat, and put itself in motion, and now it will descend with you into the sea, and ye will all be drowned: then seek for yourselves escape before destruction, and leave the merchandise.—The passengers, therefore, hearing the words of the master of the ship, hastened to go up into the vessel, leaving the merchandise, and their other goods, and their copper cooking-pots, and their fire-pots; and some reached the ship, and others reached it not. The island had moved, and descended...
“And so, about this tomb of mine . . . “
“VANITY, saith the preacher, vanity! Draw round my bed: is Anselm keeping back? Nephews—sons mine … ah God, I know not! Well— She, men would have to be your mother once, Old Gandolf envied me, so fair she was! What’s done is done, and she is dead beside, Dead long ago, and I am Bishop since, And as she died so must we die ourselves, And thence ye may perceive the world’s a dream. Life, how and what is it? As here I lie In this state-chamber, dying by degrees, Hours and long hours in the dead night, I ask “Do I live, am I dead?” Peace, peace seems all. Saint Praxed’s ever was the church for peace; And so, about this tomb of mine. I fought With tooth and nail to save my niche, ye know: —Old Gandolf cozened me, despite my care; Shrewd was that snatch from out the corner South He graced his carrion with, God curse the same! Yet still my niche is not so cramped...