Kingdom Man: A Thought from the Illiad
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
There’s a scene in Homer’s Iliad (Book 11) in the front
of my mind. The scene describes a significant turn in battle. Here’s the short
version: Agamemnon has spent nearly ten years in siege against the city of Troy
(the purpose and outcome are not the point of discussion here). The
scene-in-mind describes the Trojan Hector in battle and what captures my
attention is that which holds his attention. While the battle is raging, Hector
watches Agamemnon. When the King Agamemnon is fighting with his men on the
front, Hector keeps back but encourages his men in the melee; but, when
Agamemnon mounts his chariot, Hector steps into battle and fights until at last
the Trojans drive Agamemnon and his armies back to their ships. Hector is not
distracted by the particulars of the battle. Instead his eye is fixed on the leader
of his enemy. When Agamemnon is no longer the strength of his troops, Hector
steps in and drives the invaders away from the city.
This ancient scene comes to mind as I ponder opening
questions asked at the beginning of Tony Evans’ “Kingdom Man” Bible study. We
are given this statistic: “roughly 70 percent of all prisoners come from
fatherless homes. Approximately 80 percent of all rapists come from fatherless
homes.” Then there comes the question: “are these statistics surprising? Why or
why not?” (Caveat: I suffer from over-thinkage, so brace yourself).
My reflex action is to say, “yes” but I must honestly
say “no,” this statistic does not surprise me. My reaction to the statistic is
not “surprise.” I am not comfortable having an emotion suggested to me and I
had to honestly search to determine how I really feel. At last I have found my
word. I am not “surprised” but I am “appalled” [I hear the voice of Barry
McGovern acting as Vladimir in Samuel Beckett’s “Waiting for Godot” as he
growls out the depth of his new-found emotion (for which he, too had to search).
“AP-ALLED!”]
Why am I appalled? The problem addressed is not so much that men are in prison, nor is it that a percentage of those men are rapists that have come from fatherless homes. The problem that causes me to pale is this: there are males not in prison who don’t have the fortitude to stand up and speak truth, doing everything possible to help others stay out of there.
The real issue, the real battle is not on the front
line. Consider first the source of “fatherlessness” and who steps in to fill the
void. Evans’ discussion on fatherlessness presents only two options: the father
1) who has walked away with no sense of obligation or responsibility; or, 2) who
has made himself unavailable, unapproachable. Novelist Donald Barthelme gives
us an idea of what happens within the child who at some point searches out the
source of his confused anger:
“He is mad about being small when you were big, but
no, that’s not it, he is mad about being helpless when you were powerful, but
no not that either, he is mad about being contingent when you were necessary,
not quite it, he is insane because when he loved you, you didn’t notice.” (The
Dead Father)
What about the third option (and I suggest this not
as criticism, but as an observation): what about those families who lost their
father due to death?
Further, what about fatherless children who turned
out ok, those that are not in prison and/or are not rapists?
Here is where I find myself appalled: I along with
so many others permit these statistics, allow them to occur. I along with so
many others know what young men need to hear and know in order to 1) help them
be good earthly citizens; and 2) become heavenly citizens. I am appalled
because I let this happen. Both Hector and Agamemnon give me something to
consider: I must never leave the front lines where the battle rages against a
real enemy (don’t ask me where Menelaus was, Agamemnon’s brother). Also, I must
keep my eyes open, ready to step in and fill the gap or someone else will.
Having said this, I find God’s words both comforting
and disturbing: “I searched for a man among them who would repair the wall and
stand in the gap before Me on behalf of the land so that I might not destroy
it, but I found no one.” (Ezekiel 22:30).
God is looking for men to fill a gap. Defenses are
compromised and the city of Mansoul is in jeopardy. We must fill in the gap as
representatives of the King. This means when men go wrong, we must tell them of
their wrong based on the standards of the King. We must also point them to the way
of reconciliation to the King.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Popular posts from this blog
The Smooth-flowing Life
Legend has it that the astronomer Ptolemy (1st century A.D.) suggested that falling stars were caused by the gods moving in the heavens, thus knocking stars out of their places. Somehow people reasoned that that if the gods were moving, they must be getting close to earth so they would lift their "prayers" or "wishes" (literally, "desires") whenever they saw the stars falling in hopes the gods would notice and grant a favorable answer. But how does one wish on falling star? Once you see it, it's gone before the wish or prayer can be made! The answer is simple: meteor shower. That's how to get your wish. Mrs. Ann Hodges had a wish fall right into her lap. Sort of. In 1954 Mrs. Hodges was sleeping on the couch when a 8 1/2 pound meteorite fell through her house and into her living room where it bounced off the radio and struck her left hip leaving her with a bruise. Not sure what she was wishing, but that's not how to do it. Epictetus hel
A Reflection in Plato’s “Republic” Book 2
Early in Book 2 of Plato’s “Republic,” the discussion turns into the story of a man named Gyges who finds a ring that makes him invisible. Using the powers of the ring, he reports to the court of his king, seduces the queen “and with her help conspired against the king and slew him, and took the kingdom.” What would happen if there were two rings, one worn by an unjust man and the other by a just man? The story attempts to make the case that a just man will act unjustly if given the opportunity to think he is doing right, if only by himself. But what if he doesn’t? What if there was no ring, and what if there was a perfectly unjust man and a perfectly just man and both had everything they needed in life? The unjust man must cover his steps in order to be distinguished and succeed. In the eyes of others, he appears to be just. But what about the just man, who appears to be unjust? “They will tell you that the just man who is thought unjust will be scourged, racked, bound-will have hi