Thoughts from the "Slaughterhouse"
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
There are not many, really, so this will be over quickly. Painlessly. Much like annihilation. So it goes.
If you are a reader then Kurt
Vonneget’s “Slaughterhouse Five” should be on your reading list (perhaps it was
already). If it's not, don’t shove it to the top. It can wait.
Should you be a writer however, make certain to read this book--and do it quickly.
This short piece is simple to describe: “brace yourself.” While I can’t think I’ve
ever read anything like this (and hope I never do again), as a writer, I am
encouraged because “Slaughterhouse Five” is evidence there is no such thing as
writer’s block. Follow the example of Vonnegut: put pen to paper and write! This
book stands as an excellent example free-writing—it can be done (if Vonnegut actually had a plan, then I'm sorry)! Caveat: I did not say a story free-written would be widely
received. The story may be interesting but not much good. Vonnegut’s is not far
from manure: it’s good for gardens, but not much else.
There are few passages of genius here, such as this scene
describing the slow passing of time:
“The
time would not pass. Somebody was playing with the clocks, and not only with
the electric clocks, but the wind-up kind, too. The second hand on my watch would twitch once,
and a year would pass, and then it would twitch again. There was nothing I
could do about it. As an Earthling. I had to believe whatever the clocks said—and
calendars.”
That is simply golden.
Theological subjects surface in the story with some twisted discussions
of God and Christ. One statement catches my attention concerning the
crucifixion:
“’Oh, boy—they sure picked the wrong guy to lynch that time!’
And that thought had a brother: ‘there are right people to lynch.’ Who? People
not well connected. So it goes.”
Then there is this insightful commentary on the American
Dream:
“America is the wealthiest nation on Earth, but its people
are mainly poor, and poor Americans are urged to hate themselves. To quote the
American humorist Kin Hubbard, ‘It ain’t no disgrace to be poor, but it might
as well be.’ It is in fact a crime for an American to be poor, even though
America is a nation of poor. Every other nation has folk traditions of men who
were poor but extremely wise and virtuous, and therefore more estimable than
anyone with power and gold. No such tales are told by the American poor. They
mock themselves and glorify their betters. The meanest eating or drinking
establishment, owned by a man who is himself poor, is very likely to have a
sign on its wall asking this cruel question: ‘If you’re so smart, why ain’t you
rich?’ There will also be an American flag no larger than a child’s hand—glued to
a lollipop stick and flying from the cash register.”
Writers will do well to watch how Vonnegut uses phrases.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Popular posts from this blog
The Smooth-flowing Life
Legend has it that the astronomer Ptolemy (1st century A.D.) suggested that falling stars were caused by the gods moving in the heavens, thus knocking stars out of their places. Somehow people reasoned that that if the gods were moving, they must be getting close to earth so they would lift their "prayers" or "wishes" (literally, "desires") whenever they saw the stars falling in hopes the gods would notice and grant a favorable answer. But how does one wish on falling star? Once you see it, it's gone before the wish or prayer can be made! The answer is simple: meteor shower. That's how to get your wish. Mrs. Ann Hodges had a wish fall right into her lap. Sort of. In 1954 Mrs. Hodges was sleeping on the couch when a 8 1/2 pound meteorite fell through her house and into her living room where it bounced off the radio and struck her left hip leaving her with a bruise. Not sure what she was wishing, but that's not how to do it. Epictetus hel
A Reflection in Plato’s “Republic” Book 2
Early in Book 2 of Plato’s “Republic,” the discussion turns into the story of a man named Gyges who finds a ring that makes him invisible. Using the powers of the ring, he reports to the court of his king, seduces the queen “and with her help conspired against the king and slew him, and took the kingdom.” What would happen if there were two rings, one worn by an unjust man and the other by a just man? The story attempts to make the case that a just man will act unjustly if given the opportunity to think he is doing right, if only by himself. But what if he doesn’t? What if there was no ring, and what if there was a perfectly unjust man and a perfectly just man and both had everything they needed in life? The unjust man must cover his steps in order to be distinguished and succeed. In the eyes of others, he appears to be just. But what about the just man, who appears to be unjust? “They will tell you that the just man who is thought unjust will be scourged, racked, bound-will have hi