Reaction to "More Ready Than You Realize: Evangelism as Dance in the Postmodern Matrix"
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
As I write these thoughts on Brian McLaren's book "More Ready Than You Realize: Evangelism as Dance in the Postmodern Matrix," the headlines report in national news: the death of a hot air ballonist; the death of a child who was refused to been seen by a doctor; the death of a teenager who partied too hard; the pedophile who smiled and clapped, celebrating his 126 year sentence in the face of his victim; waiters who beat their patron to death; two men fighting it out with a hammer and letter opener; and the on-going stories of missing children or bodies found in freezers . . .
Last week I was boldly approached by a man who made a point to tell me that he was going to get drunk and not even Jesus could stop him. I gave him my card, showed him my phone number, handed him a pen and told him to write on the card the day and time he was going to die--call me just before then.
McLaren's book is hard to take seriously with these things in mind. In his introduction, McLaren explains dance as a metaphor for evangelism; that is, evangelism is the flow of conversation. At the end of the introduction, however, he reminds us that dance is the response to music. He would have found a better metaphor in pursuing the imagery of the tune because immediately he shows that "dance" really means "to skirt the issue." McLaren admits he cannot dance. This book demonstrates there are other things he cannot do, either. If dance is the metaphor for that which he loves so much, then McLaren did much toe trampling--and not the postive kind, either.
Using a two-year long conversation with a "postmodern" as a platform, McLaren does a thourough job of reinterpretation. Though he provides snippets of an actual correspondence, he uses terms such as "in my opinion," "she means," "I think," and "I suppose" explain what the correspondent may not intend. Due to this rationalization, the book really fizzles out for the following reason:
Near the middle of the book, McLaren tells us what tune he is dancing to, which explains why he dances the way he does. He is not able to address the most central issue concerning evangelism. Someone asks him plainly, "Why did Jesus have to die?" How alarming that a pastor should take up to two weeks to formulate an answer!
McLaren says, "I realized that they way he was asking the question was way I had never before asked or had been asked it." Why is that such a shocking question, unless one has not met the reality of the cross to begin with? Then he says, "Second, I realized that none of my answers fit the way he was asking it. He was not asking for an answer within the framework of Christian theology, so talking about Christ's death as a substutionary or atoning sacrifice would not help him--that kind of explanation was exactly, I guessed, what did not make sense to him." First, it was only until he asked for clarification did he understand what the man was really asking--he could stop guessing. Second, how did he come to the conclusion that the man was asking for an answer outside theology? Is there another answer outside theology? He then allows this man, lost in his sin, to shape his thinking by telling him that Jesus Himself did not know why He had to die--McLaren wonders why Stott, Packer, Boice and others did not come to this conclusion.
Someone once said plainly that a God without wrath brings men without sin into a kingdom without righteousness through the work of Christ without a cross.
Chapter 14, "Event and Process" is, among other things, an invitation to disaster. "'I have always believed in and loved God.' I used to think that people who said this were being dishonest, until I thought about John the Baptist, who was described by Luke as being filled with the Holy Spirit from his mother's womb (Luke 1:15). In other words, his infant capacity was filled with God, and his toddler capacity was similarly filled with God, and so on, until full adulthood, when he continued to live in the fulness of a relationship with God. Perhaps John was a rare or unique case, but his example opens up this possibility." The dangers here are many, namely, that there could indeed be people needing no atonement--morally perfect. The Bible teaches otherwise. Our directive is to tell people how to be saved, not to declare them saved.
McLaren ignores the music and dances to the beat of his own drum on the edge of a swimming pool filled with drowing people, hoping that someone will see he's not drowning and will join him in the dance.
Chapter 19 contains a golden nugget. McLaren excuses himself from teaching any methodology because he feels he does not need to. He is right when he says that evangelism today is contrived, but not for the reasons he gives. The timeframe of change he recounts is also correct, but he misses the reason for the change--he must miss it because I am not convinced he understands what that reason is. Evangelism has changed because the cross was removed and living biblically was replaced with man-centeredness, which amounts to idolatry.
He ends his book by saying he has nothing to teach. His only encouragement is "you are more ready than you realize." Take his advice: go read another book.
Last week I was boldly approached by a man who made a point to tell me that he was going to get drunk and not even Jesus could stop him. I gave him my card, showed him my phone number, handed him a pen and told him to write on the card the day and time he was going to die--call me just before then.
McLaren's book is hard to take seriously with these things in mind. In his introduction, McLaren explains dance as a metaphor for evangelism; that is, evangelism is the flow of conversation. At the end of the introduction, however, he reminds us that dance is the response to music. He would have found a better metaphor in pursuing the imagery of the tune because immediately he shows that "dance" really means "to skirt the issue." McLaren admits he cannot dance. This book demonstrates there are other things he cannot do, either. If dance is the metaphor for that which he loves so much, then McLaren did much toe trampling--and not the postive kind, either.
Using a two-year long conversation with a "postmodern" as a platform, McLaren does a thourough job of reinterpretation. Though he provides snippets of an actual correspondence, he uses terms such as "in my opinion," "she means," "I think," and "I suppose" explain what the correspondent may not intend. Due to this rationalization, the book really fizzles out for the following reason:
Near the middle of the book, McLaren tells us what tune he is dancing to, which explains why he dances the way he does. He is not able to address the most central issue concerning evangelism. Someone asks him plainly, "Why did Jesus have to die?" How alarming that a pastor should take up to two weeks to formulate an answer!
McLaren says, "I realized that they way he was asking the question was way I had never before asked or had been asked it." Why is that such a shocking question, unless one has not met the reality of the cross to begin with? Then he says, "Second, I realized that none of my answers fit the way he was asking it. He was not asking for an answer within the framework of Christian theology, so talking about Christ's death as a substutionary or atoning sacrifice would not help him--that kind of explanation was exactly, I guessed, what did not make sense to him." First, it was only until he asked for clarification did he understand what the man was really asking--he could stop guessing. Second, how did he come to the conclusion that the man was asking for an answer outside theology? Is there another answer outside theology? He then allows this man, lost in his sin, to shape his thinking by telling him that Jesus Himself did not know why He had to die--McLaren wonders why Stott, Packer, Boice and others did not come to this conclusion.
Someone once said plainly that a God without wrath brings men without sin into a kingdom without righteousness through the work of Christ without a cross.
Chapter 14, "Event and Process" is, among other things, an invitation to disaster. "'I have always believed in and loved God.' I used to think that people who said this were being dishonest, until I thought about John the Baptist, who was described by Luke as being filled with the Holy Spirit from his mother's womb (Luke 1:15). In other words, his infant capacity was filled with God, and his toddler capacity was similarly filled with God, and so on, until full adulthood, when he continued to live in the fulness of a relationship with God. Perhaps John was a rare or unique case, but his example opens up this possibility." The dangers here are many, namely, that there could indeed be people needing no atonement--morally perfect. The Bible teaches otherwise. Our directive is to tell people how to be saved, not to declare them saved.
McLaren ignores the music and dances to the beat of his own drum on the edge of a swimming pool filled with drowing people, hoping that someone will see he's not drowning and will join him in the dance.
Chapter 19 contains a golden nugget. McLaren excuses himself from teaching any methodology because he feels he does not need to. He is right when he says that evangelism today is contrived, but not for the reasons he gives. The timeframe of change he recounts is also correct, but he misses the reason for the change--he must miss it because I am not convinced he understands what that reason is. Evangelism has changed because the cross was removed and living biblically was replaced with man-centeredness, which amounts to idolatry.
He ends his book by saying he has nothing to teach. His only encouragement is "you are more ready than you realize." Take his advice: go read another book.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Popular posts from this blog
The Smooth-flowing Life
Legend has it that the astronomer Ptolemy (1st century A.D.) suggested that falling stars were caused by the gods moving in the heavens, thus knocking stars out of their places. Somehow people reasoned that that if the gods were moving, they must be getting close to earth so they would lift their "prayers" or "wishes" (literally, "desires") whenever they saw the stars falling in hopes the gods would notice and grant a favorable answer. But how does one wish on falling star? Once you see it, it's gone before the wish or prayer can be made! The answer is simple: meteor shower. That's how to get your wish. Mrs. Ann Hodges had a wish fall right into her lap. Sort of. In 1954 Mrs. Hodges was sleeping on the couch when a 8 1/2 pound meteorite fell through her house and into her living room where it bounced off the radio and struck her left hip leaving her with a bruise. Not sure what she was wishing, but that's not how to do it. Epictetus hel
A Reflection in Plato’s “Republic” Book 2
Early in Book 2 of Plato’s “Republic,” the discussion turns into the story of a man named Gyges who finds a ring that makes him invisible. Using the powers of the ring, he reports to the court of his king, seduces the queen “and with her help conspired against the king and slew him, and took the kingdom.” What would happen if there were two rings, one worn by an unjust man and the other by a just man? The story attempts to make the case that a just man will act unjustly if given the opportunity to think he is doing right, if only by himself. But what if he doesn’t? What if there was no ring, and what if there was a perfectly unjust man and a perfectly just man and both had everything they needed in life? The unjust man must cover his steps in order to be distinguished and succeed. In the eyes of others, he appears to be just. But what about the just man, who appears to be unjust? “They will tell you that the just man who is thought unjust will be scourged, racked, bound-will have hi