Three New Additions To My Desk
Actually, it’s an ad-duck-tion. I missed the perfect opportunity to say, “and they’re in a row, too!” Silly goose.
"Disknowledge"--Wrong On Purpose
"It is impossible for a person to begin to learn what he thinks he already knows." (Epictetus)
Seems we all know that one person who thinks he or she knows everything. The one person who can't be told anything because they seem to already know. A trait mostly found in teenagers, only some never grow out of it.
One night we were discussing a movie when a certain person chirped, "Oh, yeah. Seen it a bunch of times already. I know all about it." We looked at each other and wondered out loud, "how? It hasn't even been released yet?" The response? "Well, I just have."
That kind of person.
There are two kinds of ignorance: there is one who is not-knowing (ἀγνοεῖς--"agnoia" or "the agnostic") and the one who is not-learning (ἀμαθίᾳ--"amathia"). Here is our person, the know-it-all. The mind that endangers itself.
We might better understand if we divide the not-learning ("ignorant," as it were) into two camps: those who lack the natural ability to learn and those who are (in the words of Robert Musii) "intelligently stupid." Intelligence has not failed the know-it-all; rather, he or she has failed intelligence.
Seems we all know that one person who thinks he or she knows everything. The one person who can't be told anything because they seem to already know. A trait mostly found in teenagers, only some never grow out of it.
One night we were discussing a movie when a certain person chirped, "Oh, yeah. Seen it a bunch of times already. I know all about it." We looked at each other and wondered out loud, "how? It hasn't even been released yet?" The response? "Well, I just have."
That kind of person.
We might better understand if we divide the not-learning ("ignorant," as it were) into two camps: those who lack the natural ability to learn and those who are (in the words of Robert Musii) "intelligently stupid." Intelligence has not failed the know-it-all; rather, he or she has failed intelligence.
D.R. Khashaba says "amathia", "is not lack of knowledge: in its milder variety, it is obscure and confused thought; in its more pernicious variety, it is ‘disknowledge’ instilled into the soul by bad upbringing and bad education, consisting in false values and notions and beliefs.”
This leads us to question Socrates (no pun intended), who said, "nobody does wrong willingly," meaning that no person is wrong on purpose. If the soul is infused with disknowledge and is pointed to truth, that soul has a choice to learn. Should that soul chose to remain not-learning ("ignorant") and reject truth, that is willful defiance and the only outcome is destruction, for the self first and then others who follow suit. Like Hitler, David Koresh, Jim Jones--all thought they were doing right in their own eyes, but were instead practitioners of intelligent stupidity.
This leads us to question Socrates (no pun intended), who said, "nobody does wrong willingly," meaning that no person is wrong on purpose. If the soul is infused with disknowledge and is pointed to truth, that soul has a choice to learn. Should that soul chose to remain not-learning ("ignorant") and reject truth, that is willful defiance and the only outcome is destruction, for the self first and then others who follow suit. Like Hitler, David Koresh, Jim Jones--all thought they were doing right in their own eyes, but were instead practitioners of intelligent stupidity.
Popular posts from this blog
“Men and women who saw God in the Bible: Why did they not all die?”
July 2004 I went to Kenya, Africa to speak in two Pastor’s Conferences on the subject of Man, Sin and Salvation. At the end of each day I left just over an hour for questions (half the time were questions touching the subject of my lectures, and the other half for “open questions”; that is, people could ask anything). For the next few weeks, I will be sharing the questions that were asked of me, and my answers—and believe me when I say these people really know how to think! Question from Kenya #1: “Men and women who saw God in the Bible: Why did they not all die?” [“ But He said, ‘You cannot see My face, for no man can see Me and live! ’” (Exodus 33:20) was the basis of the student’s question]. Answer: First, consider those who did see God—how did they respond when they saw Him? They were instantly aware of their sinfulness, and God’s holiness and righteousness (to name a few. And notice also that each responded in an attitude of worship, bowing down): Abraham built altars, wors
A Sonnet
“My God, where is that ancient heat towards thee, Wherewith whole shoals of martyrs once did burn, Besides their other flames? Doth poetry Wear Venus' livery? only serve her turn? Why are not sonnets made of thee? and lays Upon thine altar burnt? Cannot thy love Heighten a spirit to sound out thy praise As well as any she? Cannot thy Dove Outstrip their Cupid easily in flight? Or, since thy ways are deep, and still the fame, Will not a verse run smooth that bears thy name! Why doth that fire, which by thy power and might Each breast does feel, no braver fuel choose Than that, which one day, worms may chance refuse. Sure Lord, there is enough in thee to dry Oceans of ink; for, as the Deluge did Cover the earth, so doth thy Majesty: Each cloud distills thy praise, and doth forbid Poets to turn it to another use. Roses and lilies speak thee; and to make A pair of cheeks of them, is thy abuse Why should I women's eyes for crystal take? Such poor invention burns in their low mind Wh
Finished Reading: Samuel Johnson
Finished reading Samuel Johnson’s insulting carefully crafted letter to Lord Chesterfield in 1755. Commonly called “literature's ‘declaration of independence’” Johnson quietly rails his patron for his help that came seven years too late. Johnson published his Dictionary without Chesterfield, paving the way for writers to publish without patronage. Chesterfield prized the letter. The most caustic line of the letter is: “The shepherd in Virgil grew at last acquainted with Love, and found him a native of the rocks.” Why was it so insulting? It should have remained in Latin.