Three New Additions To My Desk
Actually, it’s an ad-duck-tion.
Gap Identity and an Action Plan
Task:
Gaps become evident when approaching the subject of leadership. There is an overabundance of material on the definition, kinds and types of leaders, but few on the training of the whole person. What is observed is that the military seems to have provided comprehensive training that addresses character development, emotional development (mental toughness), intellectual development, personal development, even spiritual development. A case could be made through testimonies of military leaders such as James Stockdale and the practices of Navy SEALS that Stoicism might have an influence on private and public life; however, Christian leadership is not as vocal. The Bible does not directly or systematically teach leadership training in a formulaic fashion nor does it address some areas described above.
Other gaps begin to present themselves. One feature that stands out for both Christian and philosopher is the practice of what is referred to as “spiritual exercise” but there is no absolute formula or system for either camp. This is where one gap is found. Meditations clearly stands as the record of a man seeking to change and be changed by daily practice of wisdom but what does this mean for the Christian leader? Both Stoicism and Christianity have long-standing traditions of guarding and pursing wisdom. Both Stoicism and Christianity have a tradition of journaling as a spiritual practice—but is that all? A larger gap regards the spiritual exercise of stoicism and the spiritual exercise of the Christian leaders. How does the spiritual exercise of philosophy contribute to the development and growth of the Christian leader? The greatest gap is finding how the personal record of a world leader holding a non-Christian worldview “working out his philosophy” inform, instructs and models leadership for the Christian leader. It is an advanced work that depends on prior knowledge of Stoicism, which presents a problem (a gap?) in itself as the most knowledge Christians have of Stoicism is in Acts 17:18.
Other gaps might include contrasting and comparing Stoicism and Christianity, looking for those places philosophical and theological absolutes harmonize. This is not for the purpose of “redeeming” Stoicism, but for finding applicable points of Meditations. These include exploring the areas and attitudes regarding subjects such as Theology Proper, Anthropology (including the meaning of life and death), Pneumatology and Reason, Reason and Faith, Christian and Stoic discipleship, Ethics and Virtues.
The current plan of action begins with a reading plan. Meditations is divided into twelve short “books” and each entry can be a fairly quick read. Spending a few minutes each day reading one “book” in Meditations and recording first impressions is the first step. One is also creating an index of topics found within the journal to easier navigate the text. The second step involves a kind of self-experiment, noting how the entries impact personal thought and practice, including personal journaling. The third step involves reading commentaries on the work. Additional steps include looking for “signs” of Stoic influence in the plethora of leadership material and finding theological absolutes in the philosophical material (references to the soul, God or gods, prayer, providence).
Identify the gaps identified by reviewing and analyzing the Annotated Bibliography. Additionally, a plan of action needs to be developed that highlights how these gaps in the literature will be addressed via additional research.
Outcome:
The background material covers an introduction and considerations of the author of Meditations, as well as provides an overview Stoicism as practiced by him as well. The value for the Christian is suggested through a survey of Roman attitudes, historic practice of persecution and the observed balance of ethical living by Christians that benefited Roman society. This underscores the harmony of biblical ethics and philosophical ethics as practiced by the Stoics. Background material also includes observations regarding literary analysis of the text of Meditations stressing themes, longevity of the text and subsequent impact or legacy.
Gaps become evident when approaching the subject of leadership. There is an overabundance of material on the definition, kinds and types of leaders, but few on the training of the whole person. What is observed is that the military seems to have provided comprehensive training that addresses character development, emotional development (mental toughness), intellectual development, personal development, even spiritual development. A case could be made through testimonies of military leaders such as James Stockdale and the practices of Navy SEALS that Stoicism might have an influence on private and public life; however, Christian leadership is not as vocal. The Bible does not directly or systematically teach leadership training in a formulaic fashion nor does it address some areas described above.
Other gaps begin to present themselves. One feature that stands out for both Christian and philosopher is the practice of what is referred to as “spiritual exercise” but there is no absolute formula or system for either camp. This is where one gap is found. Meditations clearly stands as the record of a man seeking to change and be changed by daily practice of wisdom but what does this mean for the Christian leader? Both Stoicism and Christianity have long-standing traditions of guarding and pursing wisdom. Both Stoicism and Christianity have a tradition of journaling as a spiritual practice—but is that all? A larger gap regards the spiritual exercise of stoicism and the spiritual exercise of the Christian leaders. How does the spiritual exercise of philosophy contribute to the development and growth of the Christian leader? The greatest gap is finding how the personal record of a world leader holding a non-Christian worldview “working out his philosophy” inform, instructs and models leadership for the Christian leader. It is an advanced work that depends on prior knowledge of Stoicism, which presents a problem (a gap?) in itself as the most knowledge Christians have of Stoicism is in Acts 17:18.
Other gaps might include contrasting and comparing Stoicism and Christianity, looking for those places philosophical and theological absolutes harmonize. This is not for the purpose of “redeeming” Stoicism, but for finding applicable points of Meditations. These include exploring the areas and attitudes regarding subjects such as Theology Proper, Anthropology (including the meaning of life and death), Pneumatology and Reason, Reason and Faith, Christian and Stoic discipleship, Ethics and Virtues.
The current plan of action begins with a reading plan. Meditations is divided into twelve short “books” and each entry can be a fairly quick read. Spending a few minutes each day reading one “book” in Meditations and recording first impressions is the first step. One is also creating an index of topics found within the journal to easier navigate the text. The second step involves a kind of self-experiment, noting how the entries impact personal thought and practice, including personal journaling. The third step involves reading commentaries on the work. Additional steps include looking for “signs” of Stoic influence in the plethora of leadership material and finding theological absolutes in the philosophical material (references to the soul, God or gods, prayer, providence).
Popular posts from this blog
“Men and women who saw God in the Bible: Why did they not all die?”
July 2004 I went to Kenya, Africa to speak in two Pastor’s Conferences on the subject of Man, Sin and Salvation. At the end of each day I left just over an hour for questions (half the time were questions touching the subject of my lectures, and the other half for “open questions”; that is, people could ask anything). For the next few weeks, I will be sharing the questions that were asked of me, and my answers—and believe me when I say these people really know how to think! Question from Kenya #1: “Men and women who saw God in the Bible: Why did they not all die?” [“ But He said, ‘You cannot see My face, for no man can see Me and live! ’” (Exodus 33:20) was the basis of the student’s question]. Answer: First, consider those who did see God—how did they respond when they saw Him? They were instantly aware of their sinfulness, and God’s holiness and righteousness (to name a few. And notice also that each responded in an attitude of worship, bowing down): Abraham built altars, wors
A Sonnet
“My God, where is that ancient heat towards thee, Wherewith whole shoals of martyrs once did burn, Besides their other flames? Doth poetry Wear Venus' livery? only serve her turn? Why are not sonnets made of thee? and lays Upon thine altar burnt? Cannot thy love Heighten a spirit to sound out thy praise As well as any she? Cannot thy Dove Outstrip their Cupid easily in flight? Or, since thy ways are deep, and still the fame, Will not a verse run smooth that bears thy name! Why doth that fire, which by thy power and might Each breast does feel, no braver fuel choose Than that, which one day, worms may chance refuse. Sure Lord, there is enough in thee to dry Oceans of ink; for, as the Deluge did Cover the earth, so doth thy Majesty: Each cloud distills thy praise, and doth forbid Poets to turn it to another use. Roses and lilies speak thee; and to make A pair of cheeks of them, is thy abuse Why should I women's eyes for crystal take? Such poor invention burns in their low mind Wh
A Fresh Perception
“In primitive times, when man awakes in a world that is newly created, poetry awakes with him. In the face of the marvellous things that dazzle and intoxicate him, his first speech is a hymn simply. He is still so close to God that all his meditations are ecstatic, all his dreams are visions. His bosom swells, he sings as he breathes. His lyre has but three strings—God, the soul, creation; but this threefold mystery envelopes everything, this threefold idea embraces everything. The earth is still almost deserted. . . . He leads that nomadic pastoral life with which all civilizations begin, and which is so well adapted to solitary contemplation, to fanciful reverie. He follows every suggestion, he goes hither and thither, at random. His thought, like his life, resembles a cloud that changes its shape and its direction according to the wind that drives it. Such is the first man, such is the first poet. He is young, he is cynical. Prayer is his sole religion, the ode is his only form of