Lessons From Writing A Literature Review
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The first and greatest lesson is less about the literature review, the data or the formation of the project. One learns more about himself, about dealing with presuppositions, adjusting expectations and goals. One learns patience as one learns to think differently, theologically and philosophically.
Another lesson in developing the review is the need to temper research. By this is meant that research has changed from using any and all available print resources found in a library (as in days-gone-by) to using the internet in addition to print resources. New material is published daily, weekly and one there runs the risk of information overload. This, in turn, brings constant revision to the outline and direction of the review. On one hand, the strongest section of the outline covers background material; on the other hand, the weakest section is found toward the end where the greatest consideration is given to the gaps in application, the area of greatest development.
The review is pointing the way to refinement by virtue of prompting more questions, many not considered before the review, such as: if Marcus Aurelius proved to be the ideal philosopher-king as suggested by Plato, what can the Christian leader learn from Aurelius’ personal writings? Since Marcus’ Aurelius personal journal demonstrates the application of an integrated philosophy, what approach is fitting for the Christian whose exposure to Stoicism through the writings may be introductory? What does the Christian leader need to find in his writings, and what is one to do with that information? Which parts of Marcus Aurelius’ Stoicism contain philosophical absolutes (theological essentials) and which are particulars (negotiable)? How does this philosophy harmonize with his or her practice of theology?
The greatest assistance at this stage is found in the nine guidelines described in Chapter 11 of Galvan and Galvan, where each principle serves to fine-tune the sharpness of the review.
____________
Galvan, Jose L. and Melisa C. Galvan. 2017. Writing Literature Reviews: A Guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 7th ed. New York: Routledge. iBooks.
Another lesson in developing the review is the need to temper research. By this is meant that research has changed from using any and all available print resources found in a library (as in days-gone-by) to using the internet in addition to print resources. New material is published daily, weekly and one there runs the risk of information overload. This, in turn, brings constant revision to the outline and direction of the review. On one hand, the strongest section of the outline covers background material; on the other hand, the weakest section is found toward the end where the greatest consideration is given to the gaps in application, the area of greatest development.
The review is pointing the way to refinement by virtue of prompting more questions, many not considered before the review, such as: if Marcus Aurelius proved to be the ideal philosopher-king as suggested by Plato, what can the Christian leader learn from Aurelius’ personal writings? Since Marcus’ Aurelius personal journal demonstrates the application of an integrated philosophy, what approach is fitting for the Christian whose exposure to Stoicism through the writings may be introductory? What does the Christian leader need to find in his writings, and what is one to do with that information? Which parts of Marcus Aurelius’ Stoicism contain philosophical absolutes (theological essentials) and which are particulars (negotiable)? How does this philosophy harmonize with his or her practice of theology?
The greatest assistance at this stage is found in the nine guidelines described in Chapter 11 of Galvan and Galvan, where each principle serves to fine-tune the sharpness of the review.
____________
Galvan, Jose L. and Melisa C. Galvan. 2017. Writing Literature Reviews: A Guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 7th ed. New York: Routledge. iBooks.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Popular posts from this blog
I’ll Be Gnome For Christmas
The Island-Fish
“O ye passengers, whom may God preserve! come up quickly in to the ship, hasten to embark, and leave your merchandise, and flee with your lives, and save yourselves from destruction; for this apparent island, upon which ye are, is not really an island, but it is a great fish that hath become stationary in the midst of the sea, and the sand hath accumulated upon it, so that it hath become like an island, and trees have grown upon it since times of old; and when ye lighted the fire upon it, the fish felt the heat, and put itself in motion, and now it will descend with you into the sea, and ye will all be drowned: then seek for yourselves escape before destruction, and leave the merchandise.—The passengers, therefore, hearing the words of the master of the ship, hastened to go up into the vessel, leaving the merchandise, and their other goods, and their copper cooking-pots, and their fire-pots; and some reached the ship, and others reached it not. The island had moved, and descended...
“And so, about this tomb of mine . . . “
“VANITY, saith the preacher, vanity! Draw round my bed: is Anselm keeping back? Nephews—sons mine … ah God, I know not! Well— She, men would have to be your mother once, Old Gandolf envied me, so fair she was! What’s done is done, and she is dead beside, Dead long ago, and I am Bishop since, And as she died so must we die ourselves, And thence ye may perceive the world’s a dream. Life, how and what is it? As here I lie In this state-chamber, dying by degrees, Hours and long hours in the dead night, I ask “Do I live, am I dead?” Peace, peace seems all. Saint Praxed’s ever was the church for peace; And so, about this tomb of mine. I fought With tooth and nail to save my niche, ye know: —Old Gandolf cozened me, despite my care; Shrewd was that snatch from out the corner South He graced his carrion with, God curse the same! Yet still my niche is not so cramped...