Lessons From Writing A Literature Review
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The first and greatest lesson is less about the literature review, the data or the formation of the project. One learns more about himself, about dealing with presuppositions, adjusting expectations and goals. One learns patience as one learns to think differently, theologically and philosophically.
Another lesson in developing the review is the need to temper research. By this is meant that research has changed from using any and all available print resources found in a library (as in days-gone-by) to using the internet in addition to print resources. New material is published daily, weekly and one there runs the risk of information overload. This, in turn, brings constant revision to the outline and direction of the review. On one hand, the strongest section of the outline covers background material; on the other hand, the weakest section is found toward the end where the greatest consideration is given to the gaps in application, the area of greatest development.
The review is pointing the way to refinement by virtue of prompting more questions, many not considered before the review, such as: if Marcus Aurelius proved to be the ideal philosopher-king as suggested by Plato, what can the Christian leader learn from Aurelius’ personal writings? Since Marcus’ Aurelius personal journal demonstrates the application of an integrated philosophy, what approach is fitting for the Christian whose exposure to Stoicism through the writings may be introductory? What does the Christian leader need to find in his writings, and what is one to do with that information? Which parts of Marcus Aurelius’ Stoicism contain philosophical absolutes (theological essentials) and which are particulars (negotiable)? How does this philosophy harmonize with his or her practice of theology?
The greatest assistance at this stage is found in the nine guidelines described in Chapter 11 of Galvan and Galvan, where each principle serves to fine-tune the sharpness of the review.
____________
Galvan, Jose L. and Melisa C. Galvan. 2017. Writing Literature Reviews: A Guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 7th ed. New York: Routledge. iBooks.
Another lesson in developing the review is the need to temper research. By this is meant that research has changed from using any and all available print resources found in a library (as in days-gone-by) to using the internet in addition to print resources. New material is published daily, weekly and one there runs the risk of information overload. This, in turn, brings constant revision to the outline and direction of the review. On one hand, the strongest section of the outline covers background material; on the other hand, the weakest section is found toward the end where the greatest consideration is given to the gaps in application, the area of greatest development.
The review is pointing the way to refinement by virtue of prompting more questions, many not considered before the review, such as: if Marcus Aurelius proved to be the ideal philosopher-king as suggested by Plato, what can the Christian leader learn from Aurelius’ personal writings? Since Marcus’ Aurelius personal journal demonstrates the application of an integrated philosophy, what approach is fitting for the Christian whose exposure to Stoicism through the writings may be introductory? What does the Christian leader need to find in his writings, and what is one to do with that information? Which parts of Marcus Aurelius’ Stoicism contain philosophical absolutes (theological essentials) and which are particulars (negotiable)? How does this philosophy harmonize with his or her practice of theology?
The greatest assistance at this stage is found in the nine guidelines described in Chapter 11 of Galvan and Galvan, where each principle serves to fine-tune the sharpness of the review.
____________
Galvan, Jose L. and Melisa C. Galvan. 2017. Writing Literature Reviews: A Guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 7th ed. New York: Routledge. iBooks.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Popular posts from this blog
"On Keeping A Notebook" by Joan Didion
I'm nearly finished reading Joan Didion's collection of essays, Slouching Towards Bethlehem. The book was discovered through another book I was reading, Jon Krakauer's Eiger Dreams . If Jon felt this book was good enough to pack along on a mountain climbing expedition, then I'm interested. Took me three tries, but I finally found my copy on Amazon. One of the best book buys I've made. Joan selected the title of this book from William Butler Yeats' classic poem, Second Coming . The book title is shared with one of her larger essays, a record of encounters with people in the 1960's drug culture. Didion's book is divided into three distinct parts: "Life Styles In The Golden Land," a collection of articles capturing the California experience of the 1960's; "Personals," a few of essays of the first-hand nature; and "Seven Places Of The Mind", some thoughts about those parts of California that are now long gone. One essay...
I’ll Be Gnome For Christmas
“And so, about this tomb of mine . . . “
“VANITY, saith the preacher, vanity! Draw round my bed: is Anselm keeping back? Nephews—sons mine … ah God, I know not! Well— She, men would have to be your mother once, Old Gandolf envied me, so fair she was! What’s done is done, and she is dead beside, Dead long ago, and I am Bishop since, And as she died so must we die ourselves, And thence ye may perceive the world’s a dream. Life, how and what is it? As here I lie In this state-chamber, dying by degrees, Hours and long hours in the dead night, I ask “Do I live, am I dead?” Peace, peace seems all. Saint Praxed’s ever was the church for peace; And so, about this tomb of mine. I fought With tooth and nail to save my niche, ye know: —Old Gandolf cozened me, despite my care; Shrewd was that snatch from out the corner South He graced his carrion with, God curse the same! Yet still my niche is not so cramped...