Enchiridion 13: You Can't Have Both; or, "If you want to improve" (part 2)
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
"If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid with regard to external things. Don't wish to be thought to know anything; and even if you appear to be somebody important to others, distrust yourself. For, it is difficult to both keep your faculty of choice in a state conformable to nature, and at the same time acquire external things. But while you are careful about the one, you must of necessity neglect the other." (Epictetus, Enchiridion 13)
This is the second iteration of "If you want to improve," so there's more to learn. We can always improve. The principle again involves choice that we have no choice but to make. To understand the principle, you must first know there are two "realms" or two option involved with the application of our choice, which in turn, should help us become a better person (having made the right one).
If you want to make progress in becoming a better person:
1. " . . . be content to be thought foolish and stupid with regard to external things." Perhaps the best way to illustrate this would be to consider that rare person who is more interested in protecting their mind, integrity and moral character over watching the news, using social media, getting "plugged in." I work with people who for years have had no cell phone, no laptop--they stayed in the "stone age"--but they are brilliant, upright leaders. Are they foolish because these are the ones sought out for advice, for wisdom>
2. "Don't wish to be thought to know anything." If you pay attention to anything at all, you do actually know something. But does this mean that because you know something that you must tell others? Another way to say this would be, "don't burden others with what they may not care to know." Nobody cares to know about everything you read, what you know. Be keen to if/when people are receptive. Be content to keep your thoughts to yourself.
3. " . . . if you appear to be somebody important to others, distrust yourself." Recently someone bragged, "those people look up to me." There was no reason for such a boast beyond the obvious fact that the speaker was taller. This same person has more Facebook friends than anyone I know (no pun intended) but truthfully, most of those "friends" are total strangers. Arrogance and focusing on externals are dangerous and horrible diseases. Don't be a fake. But what if someone shares a genuine praise? Accept the words with humility, but don't dwell on them.
CONCLUSION:
" For, it is difficult to both keep your faculty of choice in a state conformable to nature, and at the same time acquire external things. But while you are careful about the one, you must of necessity neglect the other."
Here's the inescapable choice: you can either control what you are able (how you respond) or you can "have it all" and allow what is external define your identity. You can't have both.
This is the second iteration of "If you want to improve," so there's more to learn. We can always improve. The principle again involves choice that we have no choice but to make. To understand the principle, you must first know there are two "realms" or two option involved with the application of our choice, which in turn, should help us become a better person (having made the right one).
If you want to make progress in becoming a better person:
1. " . . . be content to be thought foolish and stupid with regard to external things." Perhaps the best way to illustrate this would be to consider that rare person who is more interested in protecting their mind, integrity and moral character over watching the news, using social media, getting "plugged in." I work with people who for years have had no cell phone, no laptop--they stayed in the "stone age"--but they are brilliant, upright leaders. Are they foolish because these are the ones sought out for advice, for wisdom>
2. "Don't wish to be thought to know anything." If you pay attention to anything at all, you do actually know something. But does this mean that because you know something that you must tell others? Another way to say this would be, "don't burden others with what they may not care to know." Nobody cares to know about everything you read, what you know. Be keen to if/when people are receptive. Be content to keep your thoughts to yourself.
3. " . . . if you appear to be somebody important to others, distrust yourself." Recently someone bragged, "those people look up to me." There was no reason for such a boast beyond the obvious fact that the speaker was taller. This same person has more Facebook friends than anyone I know (no pun intended) but truthfully, most of those "friends" are total strangers. Arrogance and focusing on externals are dangerous and horrible diseases. Don't be a fake. But what if someone shares a genuine praise? Accept the words with humility, but don't dwell on them.
CONCLUSION:
" For, it is difficult to both keep your faculty of choice in a state conformable to nature, and at the same time acquire external things. But while you are careful about the one, you must of necessity neglect the other."
Here's the inescapable choice: you can either control what you are able (how you respond) or you can "have it all" and allow what is external define your identity. You can't have both.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Popular posts from this blog
The Smooth-flowing Life
Legend has it that the astronomer Ptolemy (1st century A.D.) suggested that falling stars were caused by the gods moving in the heavens, thus knocking stars out of their places. Somehow people reasoned that that if the gods were moving, they must be getting close to earth so they would lift their "prayers" or "wishes" (literally, "desires") whenever they saw the stars falling in hopes the gods would notice and grant a favorable answer. But how does one wish on falling star? Once you see it, it's gone before the wish or prayer can be made! The answer is simple: meteor shower. That's how to get your wish. Mrs. Ann Hodges had a wish fall right into her lap. Sort of. In 1954 Mrs. Hodges was sleeping on the couch when a 8 1/2 pound meteorite fell through her house and into her living room where it bounced off the radio and struck her left hip leaving her with a bruise. Not sure what she was wishing, but that's not how to do it. Epictetus hel
A Reflection in Plato’s “Republic” Book 2
Early in Book 2 of Plato’s “Republic,” the discussion turns into the story of a man named Gyges who finds a ring that makes him invisible. Using the powers of the ring, he reports to the court of his king, seduces the queen “and with her help conspired against the king and slew him, and took the kingdom.” What would happen if there were two rings, one worn by an unjust man and the other by a just man? The story attempts to make the case that a just man will act unjustly if given the opportunity to think he is doing right, if only by himself. But what if he doesn’t? What if there was no ring, and what if there was a perfectly unjust man and a perfectly just man and both had everything they needed in life? The unjust man must cover his steps in order to be distinguished and succeed. In the eyes of others, he appears to be just. But what about the just man, who appears to be unjust? “They will tell you that the just man who is thought unjust will be scourged, racked, bound-will have hi