Enchiridion 41: Not To Excess
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
"It is a mark of want of intellect, to spend much time in things relating to the body; as to be immoderate in exercises, in eating and drinking, and in the discharge of other animal functions. These things should be done incidentally and our main strength be applied to our reason." (Epictetus, Enchiridion 41)
I can't help but wonder what the background is to this statement. I've not read enough Stoic philosophy to get the full picture of the principle. One feature that seems clear (key word: "seems"--in my opinion) is that Epictetus is making a statement against Epicurianism.
In sweeping over-generalizations, permit me to explain what I do understand: Epicurianism held that "good" is whatever brings the most pleasure, so that which brings happiness is what is worth pursuing. "Do what you like" or "do your own thing" as long as it does not interfere with the happiness of someone else. Stoicism, on the other hand, advocates virtue over physical happiness. Virtue is to be pursued for to be virtuous is to be happy.
Perhaps Epictetus might be saying is: you are more than the body. Exercise, but not in excess; eat and drink, but not in excess; enjoy your . . . uh . . . bodily discharges (in all forms), but not in excess. Apply strength to reason, where you really reside.
I can't help but wonder what the background is to this statement. I've not read enough Stoic philosophy to get the full picture of the principle. One feature that seems clear (key word: "seems"--in my opinion) is that Epictetus is making a statement against Epicurianism.
In sweeping over-generalizations, permit me to explain what I do understand: Epicurianism held that "good" is whatever brings the most pleasure, so that which brings happiness is what is worth pursuing. "Do what you like" or "do your own thing" as long as it does not interfere with the happiness of someone else. Stoicism, on the other hand, advocates virtue over physical happiness. Virtue is to be pursued for to be virtuous is to be happy.
Perhaps Epictetus might be saying is: you are more than the body. Exercise, but not in excess; eat and drink, but not in excess; enjoy your . . . uh . . . bodily discharges (in all forms), but not in excess. Apply strength to reason, where you really reside.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Popular posts from this blog
The Smooth-flowing Life
Legend has it that the astronomer Ptolemy (1st century A.D.) suggested that falling stars were caused by the gods moving in the heavens, thus knocking stars out of their places. Somehow people reasoned that that if the gods were moving, they must be getting close to earth so they would lift their "prayers" or "wishes" (literally, "desires") whenever they saw the stars falling in hopes the gods would notice and grant a favorable answer. But how does one wish on falling star? Once you see it, it's gone before the wish or prayer can be made! The answer is simple: meteor shower. That's how to get your wish. Mrs. Ann Hodges had a wish fall right into her lap. Sort of. In 1954 Mrs. Hodges was sleeping on the couch when a 8 1/2 pound meteorite fell through her house and into her living room where it bounced off the radio and struck her left hip leaving her with a bruise. Not sure what she was wishing, but that's not how to do it. Epictetus hel
A Reflection in Plato’s “Republic” Book 2
Early in Book 2 of Plato’s “Republic,” the discussion turns into the story of a man named Gyges who finds a ring that makes him invisible. Using the powers of the ring, he reports to the court of his king, seduces the queen “and with her help conspired against the king and slew him, and took the kingdom.” What would happen if there were two rings, one worn by an unjust man and the other by a just man? The story attempts to make the case that a just man will act unjustly if given the opportunity to think he is doing right, if only by himself. But what if he doesn’t? What if there was no ring, and what if there was a perfectly unjust man and a perfectly just man and both had everything they needed in life? The unjust man must cover his steps in order to be distinguished and succeed. In the eyes of others, he appears to be just. But what about the just man, who appears to be unjust? “They will tell you that the just man who is thought unjust will be scourged, racked, bound-will have hi