Stop Reading
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
That's right. Stop reading.
Of course to find the reason why, you must keep reading.
Bear with me a moment, please.
Marcus Aurelius left himself a note at the beginning of his personal journal, a note to himself, that simply says, "throw away your books." Another Roman senator wrote to his friend encouraging him to stop gorging himself on books. What kind of advice is this? How is one to learn, to gain wisdom if one does not read? Is experience enough? Do we have enough resources within reach without reading?
We are drowning in information and a high percentage of that information means absolutely nothing. Among other things, this very blog bears a number of posts regarding reading and I confess that I've done my part in contributing to--well, let's just say, "the pile."
What do we have the ancients did not? The internet, blogs, magazines, e-zines, newspapers, and going a step further, various forms of media that include the news, entertainment--so many ways to relay information. The ancients had whatever was written in stone (which was not much, due to production, basically), on papyri or later on parchment scrolls. What did they mean, then, to discourage reading?
The reason is simple: one who reads over-much may think more highly of themselves than they should. One who reads without purpose exposes himself to influences beyond his control and easily susceptible to untested ideas. They acquire what we may translate from the Greek as "intelligent stupidity." They've got a bunch of facts, a wealth of knowledge, but no wisdom.
So what do we do? We can't stop reading, but we mustn't read everything.
Ask yourself a some questions:
1) What does my reading material have to do with me?
2) What am I doing with the information I read? Does it just go in my head only to be forgotten?
3) What contribution does this make to my life? How am I a better person, by what I read?
Believe me, I'm a bibliophile and wrestling with this concept is not easy, especially when there are so many books on my own shelf I've not yet read. And parting with books is not easy--but that's a personal problem. And writing--I am now made to be more careful, more intentional about what I contribute to "the pile."
But it's something to think about.
Now that you've read it.
Of course to find the reason why, you must keep reading.
Bear with me a moment, please.
Marcus Aurelius left himself a note at the beginning of his personal journal, a note to himself, that simply says, "throw away your books." Another Roman senator wrote to his friend encouraging him to stop gorging himself on books. What kind of advice is this? How is one to learn, to gain wisdom if one does not read? Is experience enough? Do we have enough resources within reach without reading?
We are drowning in information and a high percentage of that information means absolutely nothing. Among other things, this very blog bears a number of posts regarding reading and I confess that I've done my part in contributing to--well, let's just say, "the pile."
What do we have the ancients did not? The internet, blogs, magazines, e-zines, newspapers, and going a step further, various forms of media that include the news, entertainment--so many ways to relay information. The ancients had whatever was written in stone (which was not much, due to production, basically), on papyri or later on parchment scrolls. What did they mean, then, to discourage reading?
The reason is simple: one who reads over-much may think more highly of themselves than they should. One who reads without purpose exposes himself to influences beyond his control and easily susceptible to untested ideas. They acquire what we may translate from the Greek as "intelligent stupidity." They've got a bunch of facts, a wealth of knowledge, but no wisdom.
So what do we do? We can't stop reading, but we mustn't read everything.
Ask yourself a some questions:
1) What does my reading material have to do with me?
2) What am I doing with the information I read? Does it just go in my head only to be forgotten?
3) What contribution does this make to my life? How am I a better person, by what I read?
Believe me, I'm a bibliophile and wrestling with this concept is not easy, especially when there are so many books on my own shelf I've not yet read. And parting with books is not easy--but that's a personal problem. And writing--I am now made to be more careful, more intentional about what I contribute to "the pile."
But it's something to think about.
Now that you've read it.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Popular posts from this blog
The Smooth-flowing Life
Legend has it that the astronomer Ptolemy (1st century A.D.) suggested that falling stars were caused by the gods moving in the heavens, thus knocking stars out of their places. Somehow people reasoned that that if the gods were moving, they must be getting close to earth so they would lift their "prayers" or "wishes" (literally, "desires") whenever they saw the stars falling in hopes the gods would notice and grant a favorable answer. But how does one wish on falling star? Once you see it, it's gone before the wish or prayer can be made! The answer is simple: meteor shower. That's how to get your wish. Mrs. Ann Hodges had a wish fall right into her lap. Sort of. In 1954 Mrs. Hodges was sleeping on the couch when a 8 1/2 pound meteorite fell through her house and into her living room where it bounced off the radio and struck her left hip leaving her with a bruise. Not sure what she was wishing, but that's not how to do it. Epictetus hel
A Reflection in Plato’s “Republic” Book 2
Early in Book 2 of Plato’s “Republic,” the discussion turns into the story of a man named Gyges who finds a ring that makes him invisible. Using the powers of the ring, he reports to the court of his king, seduces the queen “and with her help conspired against the king and slew him, and took the kingdom.” What would happen if there were two rings, one worn by an unjust man and the other by a just man? The story attempts to make the case that a just man will act unjustly if given the opportunity to think he is doing right, if only by himself. But what if he doesn’t? What if there was no ring, and what if there was a perfectly unjust man and a perfectly just man and both had everything they needed in life? The unjust man must cover his steps in order to be distinguished and succeed. In the eyes of others, he appears to be just. But what about the just man, who appears to be unjust? “They will tell you that the just man who is thought unjust will be scourged, racked, bound-will have hi