Not "What" But "How" You Read
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
It's one thing to love books. It's another to love what's in them.
So when someone says, "I love books," it might be good to ask "what do you mean?" They might not even know until you ask them.
At a friends house not too long ago, I spied an ancient set of Robert Burns poetic works on a bookshelf. With permission I thumbed through the tomes, commenting on this or that poem, reading a couple out loud in my best Scottish brogue. My friend stared at me for a moment then said, "take 'em." Quickly pulling the set down and moving other books around so that his wife would not know they were gone, we snuck the books out to my car. He admitted the only reason they were on the shelf was for decoration. They knew nothing of Robert Burns or his poetry (gasp!). So I gladly took the books.
Collecting books over the years, I must admit that only a few on my shelves are for decoration. But they are not just any books--they are books I'd actually read--and plan to some day. Regardless, we have a small library (yes, many are referenced).
My goal has been to place myself within a cloud of people who influenced and shaped cultures. Great Thinkers. "But what if one person say "this" and another says "that" on a matter? What if they disagree?" Good question. What if I disagree with the author? As a friend of mine says, "read people that make you mad." Well, ok. I've done that for years. But what have I learned? Is it good to have so much to read? I admit: I often pass a book and ask, "do I really need that one?"
About the same time Jesus walked the earth, Seneca (a Roman Senator) wrote a note to a friend in Sicily regarding reading. He penned:
"Be careful, however, lest this reading of many authors and books of every sort may tend to make you discursive and unsteady. You must linger among a limited number of master thinkers, and digest their works, if you would derive ideas which shall win firm hold in your mind. . .
. . . Food does no good and is not assimilated into the body if it leaves the stomach as soon as it is eaten; nothing hinders a cure so much as frequent change of medicine; no wound will heal when one salve is tried after another; a plant which is often moved can never grow strong.
There is nothing so efficacious that it can be helpful while it is being shifted about. And in reading of many books is distraction.
Accordingly, since you cannot read all the books which you may possess, it is enough to possess only as many books as you can read . . . .
. . . Each day acquire something that will fortify you against poverty, against death, indeed against other misfortunes as well; and after you have run over many thoughts, select one to be thoroughly digested that day."
(Seneca, Moral Letters 2 "On Discursiveness In Reading")
A few days ago, I was already thinking of how I wanted to narrow my reading focus. I mean, the pile of books on my bed-side table is again growing a pile of good intentions, but really . . . I'm no butterfly to go flitting around the flowers. Every day I listen to a five minute thought on the way to work, then I read two more short thoughts and set my mind to one of the three all day long (today, Seneca won). I want to learn from that one thing.
Never stop reading. Just don't be distracted by so many "voices" that your mind can't focus on your one thing. Read to learn. Read to be challenged. Read to grow. Think of reading is like a buffet--you can't have everything. I mean, you could but what good does it do you?
Let one thing you read be meaningful enough to fortify you.
A few days ago, I was already thinking of how I wanted to narrow my reading focus. I mean, the pile of books on my bed-side table is again growing a pile of good intentions, but really . . . I'm no butterfly to go flitting around the flowers. Every day I listen to a five minute thought on the way to work, then I read two more short thoughts and set my mind to one of the three all day long (today, Seneca won). I want to learn from that one thing.
Never stop reading. Just don't be distracted by so many "voices" that your mind can't focus on your one thing. Read to learn. Read to be challenged. Read to grow. Think of reading is like a buffet--you can't have everything. I mean, you could but what good does it do you?
Let one thing you read be meaningful enough to fortify you.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Popular posts from this blog
The Smooth-flowing Life
Legend has it that the astronomer Ptolemy (1st century A.D.) suggested that falling stars were caused by the gods moving in the heavens, thus knocking stars out of their places. Somehow people reasoned that that if the gods were moving, they must be getting close to earth so they would lift their "prayers" or "wishes" (literally, "desires") whenever they saw the stars falling in hopes the gods would notice and grant a favorable answer. But how does one wish on falling star? Once you see it, it's gone before the wish or prayer can be made! The answer is simple: meteor shower. That's how to get your wish. Mrs. Ann Hodges had a wish fall right into her lap. Sort of. In 1954 Mrs. Hodges was sleeping on the couch when a 8 1/2 pound meteorite fell through her house and into her living room where it bounced off the radio and struck her left hip leaving her with a bruise. Not sure what she was wishing, but that's not how to do it. Epictetus hel...
A Reflection in Plato’s “Republic” Book 2
Early in Book 2 of Plato’s “Republic,” the discussion turns into the story of a man named Gyges who finds a ring that makes him invisible. Using the powers of the ring, he reports to the court of his king, seduces the queen “and with her help conspired against the king and slew him, and took the kingdom.” What would happen if there were two rings, one worn by an unjust man and the other by a just man? The story attempts to make the case that a just man will act unjustly if given the opportunity to think he is doing right, if only by himself. But what if he doesn’t? What if there was no ring, and what if there was a perfectly unjust man and a perfectly just man and both had everything they needed in life? The unjust man must cover his steps in order to be distinguished and succeed. In the eyes of others, he appears to be just. But what about the just man, who appears to be unjust? “They will tell you that the just man who is thought unjust will be scourged, racked, bound-wil...